NATO is observing its largest and most pivotal member as it contemplates redefining borders through diplomacy, economic pressure, or military measures. What direction will Trump choose?

US President Donald Trump resumed office promising to act as a peace-driven leader worthy of a Nobel accolade. Despite facing criticism, his moves indicate a genuine pursuit of peace.

A portion of Venezuela. Possibly a segment of Cuba. Now, the entire territory of Greenland is officially under his consideration.

Trump alleges the Arctic is teeming with Chinese vessels. He ridiculed Denmark for safeguarding the island with merely «one more dog sled».

The factual situation? Greenland already accommodates a substantial US space facility, while Denmark recently conducted large-scale NATO drills in the frigid region.

Simultaneously, melting ice opens new maritime pathways and improves access to rare earth elements—the materials integral to smartphones. The approach is evident from the Venezuelan example. Washington seeks more than security; it aims to control resources.

The strategy? Trump’s envoy Jeff Landry is currently avoiding Danish officials, opting instead to communicate directly with locals over interests like «hunting and fishing».

That may seem friendly, but it’s misleading. Shortly after the Caracas operation, the White House signals that employing military force remains «always an option».

European authorities are outraged. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz emphasizes that borders are non-negotiable.

Yet, the unsettling question remains: if the US can threaten annexation of a portion of a dependable NATO partner, does the concept of enemy states even hold relevance?

Watch the full report in the Euronews video player above.

Journalists • Jakub Janas